Close

Articles Posted in Statute of Limitations Defense

Updated:

Statute of Limitations for Legal Malpractice is Not Tolled By An Appeal

I last discussed this problematic topic on June 30th. This unpublished decision, Godbold v. Karlin & Fleisher, LLC, 2014 IL App (1st) 131523-U, illustrates a malpractice trap contained in Illinois law. Usually, the rule in Illinois is that you must wait to file your malpractice action until you lose the…

Updated:

When to Sue When A Lawyer’s Advice Causes Litigation

Illinois has two statutes that establish time limits for when you can sue for legal malpractice. The statute of limitations gives the plaintiff two years from the time the negligence was discovered. However, the statute of repose bars any claim unless the negligent act occurred within six years of the…

Updated:

Statute of Limitations Bars Estate Planning Malpractice Claim

Illinois has a statute of limitations (2 years from discovery) and a statute of repose (6 years from the alleged negligent act by the attorney). In estate planning matters, Illinois also has another provision 735 ILCS 5/13-214.3(d) which governs injuries that occur on the death of the client. In 2002,…

Updated:

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. RISEBOROUGH, Ill: Supreme Court 2014 – Google Scholar

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. RISEBOROUGH, Ill: Supreme Court 2014 – Google Scholar. The Illinois Statute of Repose bars claims against a lawyer arising out of actions that occurred more than six years before the case was filed. In this case, an insurance company (Evanston) sued two lawyers and alleged that…

Updated:

New York Court Correctly Holds That Lawyer’s Death Does Not Bar Legal Malpractice Claim

Cabrera v Collazo 2014 NY Slip Op 00622. This is an opinion of the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division. The facts were simple. The attorney missed the applicable statute of limitations and the client’s claim was barred. In such cases, the lawyer is liable for legal malpractice if the…

Updated:

Illinois Court Holds That The Two-Year SOL Applies to Aiding and Abetting Claim

800 SOUTH WELLS COMMERCIAL, LLC v. HORWOOD MARCUS AND BERK CHARTERED, Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2013 – Google Scholar. Plaintiff alleged that Horwood Marcus & Berk (HMB) aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty by Nicholas Gouletas and John Cadden. Legal malpractice is governed by a…

Updated:

Tax Shelter Malpractice Case Held Barred by Statute of Limitations

Steinmetz v. WOLGAMOT, Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 1st Div. 2013 – Google Scholar. In 1997, Dr. Steinmetz enrolled in a program known as AEGIS, which the defendants informed him would protect his assets and reduce his tax liabilities. The IRS disagreed and sent Dr. Steinmetz a deficiency notice on…

Updated:

District Court Dismisses Divorce Malpractice Claim

VALUKAS v. BOTTI MARINACCIO, LTD, Dist. Court, ND Illinois 2013 – Google Scholar. This is a decision dismissing a divorce malpractice claim on statute of limitations grounds. The plaintiff, James Valukas, hired the defendant law firm to represent him in his divorce. Valukas claimed that the law firm negligently drafted…

Updated:

Lawyer Is Accused of Failing To Document A Settlement Of Divorce Case

O’KELLYN v. Dawson, 2013 PA Super 25 – Pa: Superior Court 2013 – Google Scholar. This is a case where a lawyer was accused of legal malpractice for failing to properly document a settlement of a divorce case. The settlement related to an award of maintenance. The parties agreed on…

Updated:

Kentucky Supreme Court Upholds Legal Malpractice Case and Discusses Case Within A Case Requirement

Osborne v. Keeney, Ky: Supreme Court 2012 – Google Scholar. This is a legal malpractice case in which the plaintiff alleged that her lawyer failed to file a lawsuit on time and missed the applicable statute of limitations.  The Kentucky Supreme Court upheld the claim and addressed other issues as…

Contact The Clinton Law Firm