Close

Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Yes – There Was A Conflict of Interest – But No Legal Malpractice Case

The case is GB v. Christine Rossi, A-240-17T3. The case was decided in New Jersey and is an unpublished opinion. The case illustrates one problem with legal malpractice cases – there may be wrongful conduct, but the plaintiff must tie the wrongful conduct to her damages. Plaintiff was getting divorced.…

Updated:

Ouch – Kentucky Supreme Court Reinstates Punitive Damages Award Against Accounting Firm

The case is Yung v. Grant Thornton, 2016-SC-00571 and 2017-SC-00151. The plaintiffs sued Grant Thornton for fraud for placing them in a tax shelter. The IRS disallowed the tax shelter and the Yungs were required to pay $20 million in back taxes and penalties. The Yungs sued Grant Thornton for…

Updated:

How can a prospective client tell if he has a legal malpractice claim?

I often receive phone calls and emails from people who believe that they have a legal malpractice claim against their current lawyer. Most of these claims are not malpractice claims, often because the underlying matter or lawsuit is not finished. So, someone calls and says that her lawyer missed court…

Updated:

Carefully Drafted Engagement Letter Protects Law Firm From Claim That It Allowed SOL to Run

The case is Davis v. Cohen & Gresser, 2018 NY Slip Op 02542, a legal malpractice case filed against a law firm. Davis alleged that the law firm allowed the statute of limitations to run on RICO claims by failing to name to key parties in a lawsuit. The court ultimately concluded…

Updated:

Illinois Appellate Court Rejects “Legal Fee” Claim Filed by Non-Lawyer

The case is captioned Robert Iuffues Webb II v. Janice Holmes, 2018 IL App (3d) 170167. Webb, who is not licensed to practice law, alleged that he had assisted Holmes with certain federal litigation. It is not clear exactly what the federal litigation involved. He alleged that he entered into an…

Updated:

New York District Court Holds That Plaintiff Adequately Alleged that Lawyer Missed Statute of Limitations on Employment Claims

The case is Alexander Prout v. Anne C. Vladeck & Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, P.C., 18 CV 260 (S.D. New York June 10, 2018). Prout alleged that he retained Vladeck to represent him in connection with claims against his former employer, Invesco. He further alleged that Vladeck advised him to…

Updated:

Condominium Owner Cannot Sue The Condominium Association’s Lawyer

One issue that arises frequently in legal malpractice cases is – to whom does the lawyer owe a duty? Here, a condominium owner sued the lawyer for the condominium association for breach of contract. The court dismissed the case and the Colorado Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal. The Colorado Supreme…

Contact The Clinton Law Firm