Close

Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Rojo v. Tunick Is An Important Legal Malpractice Decision Because It Distinguishes the Actual Innocence Rule

Rojo v. Tunick, 2021 Il App (2d) 200191, is a legal malpractice case filed by a criminal defendant against his former lawyer. Usually these cases are quickly resolved because the plaintiff cannot plead actual innocence. Since Rojo was convicted he could not plead actual innocence. However, Rojo alleged a second…

Updated:

Actual Innocence Rule Applies – Malpractice Case Dismissed

In a recent California legal malpractice case, Andrade v. Purviance, No. A161331, California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate District 2021, the court upheld the dismissal of a legal malpractice case against a criminal defense attorney where the plaintiff could not show that she had been exonerated.  In recent years, some…

Updated:

No Coverage Where Insured Knew Basis of Claim Before Policy’s Start Date

The case is ALPS Prop. & Cas. v. Keller, Reynolds 482 P.3d 638 (Montana, 2021). After purchasing the malpractice insurance policy, the firm sought to tender a malpractice claim to the insurer. Unfortunately for the lawyers, the insurer denied coverage because the law firm knew the basis of the malpractice…

Updated:

Proximate Causation Requirement Defeats Bankruptcy Malpractice Claim

In any lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove proximate causation, that the actions of the defendant caused him injury. Here, in a bankruptcy malpractice case, the plaintiff was unable to prove proximate causation. Plaintiff alleged that the bankruptcy lawyers breached the standard of care when the failed to extinguish a liability…

Updated:

Court Holds That Client Has Stated Claim for Legal Malpractice Against Bankruptcy Firm

Horvath v. Budin, Reisman, Kupferberg & Bernstein, LLP, 2021 NY Slip Op 30105 is a legal malpractice claim arising out of a bankruptcy matter. In particular, the claim was that the bankruptcy firm failed to list Horvath’s personal injury case in the bankruptcy schedules, resulting in the loss of that…

Updated:

In Illinois The Statute of Limitations Usually Expires Two Years After An Adverse Judgment

Short v. Grayson, No. 16-cv-2150 N.D. IL, September 3, 2021 is a malpractice case where the plaintiff alleged that his lawyer was negligent in handling litigation. The problem was that the litigation reached a final adverse judgment in 2013, but the malpractice case was not filed for three years. The…

Updated:

CLE Presentation On Avoiding Malpractice in Family Law Litigation

Thanks to Lawline for hosting this program.   https://www.lawline.com/course/avoiding-malpractice-in-family-law-matters?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transactional&utm_campaign=course-live The program discusses typical malpractice claims made against family law attorneys. Family law attorneys, unfortunately, are often involved in highly contentious matters with emotional parties. That is a breeding ground for claims.

Contact The Clinton Law Firm