Close

Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Kentucky Appeals Court Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment to Lawyer

Sammet v. Helline is an unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky. The case number is 2018-CA-1033. The story is familiar: a divorce lawyer sued for unpaid legal fees and received a legal malpractice counterclaim in return. Here, the lawyer prevailed as the former client was unable to…

Updated:

Union Member Cannot Bring Legal Malpractice Claim Against Union Or Its Lawyer

Zander v. Carlson and the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police, 2019 IL App (1st) 181868, is a legal malpractice opinion which holds that a union member who retains a union appointed attorney to represent him in challenging an employment action, cannot file a malpractice claim because filing such a claim would…

Updated:

In Unpublished Decision Ninth Circuit Reinstates Legal Malpractice Claim

The case, Nancy Setterquist v. Law Offices of Ted D. Billbe, P.C., N0. 18-35880, is an unpublished decision of the Ninth Circuit that raises important issues. The case is a divorce malpractice case. Setterquist alleged that her lawyer allowed the court to enter an erroneous order. Based on the text…

Updated:

Another Reminder – You Should Have Legal Malpractice Insurance

Illinois does not require a lawyer to have insurance. However, the ARDC requests that you inform it each year whether or not you have insurance. My advice to the public is that you should never hire a lawyer who is uninsured. First, if something goes wrong, you have little chance…

Updated:

Some Issues To Consider Before You File A Malpractice Claim

There are a number of issues that you should consider before you file a legal malpractice claim against a lawyer. Your lawyer should discuss these issues with you so that you understand how to proceed: Did the lawyer cause your harm or was it caused by someone or something else?…

Updated:

Carefully Drafted Engagement Letter Defeats Legal Malpractice Claim

In Flusser v. Bikel, 2019 NY Slip Op 32847(U), the plaintiff was involved in a contentious divorce. She discharged one firm and then hired the Defendant law firm (Bikel v. Mandarano) to represent her. At the conclusion of the divorce case, Plaintiff filed a legal malpractice claim against the Defendant…

Updated:

District Court Rejects Judicial Error Defense Raised by Defendant

The case is captioned American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. Hope, 17 C 7934, the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected a law firm’s summary judgment motion based on the doctrine of judicial error. Usually, if there is a judicial error, that would constitute a defense to a legal…

Updated:

Idaho Supreme Court Reinstates Claim Against Divorce Lawyer

In Parkinson v. Bevis, (Docket No. 46269), the Idaho Supreme Court reinstated an equitable disgorgement action filed by a client against her former divorce attorney. Parkinson filed a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against her former attorney, alleging that he wrongfully revealed a confidential email to her ex-husband’s attorney…

Contact The Clinton Law Firm