Close

Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog

Updated:

The “Invited Error” Doctrine Defeats Legal Malpractice Claim

Plaintiff lost his malpractice claim against his lawyers because the court deemed his expert reports inadmissible.  In the alternative, Plaintiff argued that his lawyers were negligent by failing to dispute the court’s finding that the operations of a company were illegal. The New Jersey Appellate Court rejected that argument on…

Updated:

Court Dismisses Malpractice Claim Arising Out of Failed Appeal

Plaintiff claimed that her lawyer was negligent in his handling of her appeal from a case in which plaintiff claimed that Well Fargo had discriminated against her. Plaintiff’s legal malpractice case was dismissed because plaintiff could not show how any lawyer could have won the appeal. The court put it…

Updated:

Statute of Limitations Defeats Malpractice Claim

The statute of limitations often defeats legal malpractice claims that might otherwise have some merit. The statute of limitations is the best possible defense a lawyer can have. The statute of limitations differs from state to state. As a client, the important thing to remember is to get moving as…

Updated:

Texas Revives A Legal Malpractice Claim Based on A Failure to Seek and Collect Damages

The Supreme Court of Texas has issued an opinion in USA Lending Group, Inc. v. Winstead, P.C., 669 S.W.3d 195 (2023). In this case the client sued its former law firm for failing to request damages in a default judgment motion. USA Lending hired the law firm to sue its…

Contact The Clinton Law Firm